The iPhone is to the Droid as Madonna is to Cyndi Lauper.

I firmly believe that you can judge a product's impact
based on the strength of the reaction. Kim Kardashian and Paris Hilton are perfect examples. Kim
K continuously gets blasted for being famous for nothing. However, anyone that
can bring out that much rage from the public must have made a
serious impact. Comparatively, Paris
Hilton has dropped off the face of the earth even though she was a much bigger “famous for nothing” star in the early years.
In fact Kim was just one of her unknown friends. As time has gone by though, the
public has forgotten about Paris.
People simply don't care about her. Is it better to be forgotten or so famous you're hated? The opposite of love is ambivalence
and there is a thin line between love and hate.
Back to the iPhone. I started this post out with an analogy comparing the iPhone with Madonna. They have a much more symbiotic relationship then you may think. Both are cultural icons that changed their respective industries. Actually, they both changed the music industry. Critics may say they are past their prime while fans say it only gets better with age. Regardless of which side you're on, the iPhone (and Madonna) made history and will get a section in pop culture history books while the Droid (and Cyndi Lauper) will be described in a patronizing foot note: "Very underrated."
No comments:
Post a Comment